MeanGene Rants                                                                              6 March 2002

California Electricity Markets - What Happened?

Many people have wondered just what in the hell happened in California in the last year in the energy market, and why? A look at the "rules of the game" is very interesting.

 

Cool Stuff

·        Recharge your laptop with your feet. http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/54/24090.html

·        The Greenest Car: http://www.cnn.com/2002/TECH/science/02/05/green.vehicles/index.html

·        How Hybrids Work http://www.howstuffworks.com/hybrid-car.htm

·        Still the coolest - the solar chimney http://www.meangene.com/energy/solarChimney.html

 

California Electricity - What Were the Rules of the Game?

People are very fuzzy on what happened in California during its electricity crisis, and why. Most people know four "facts".

·        California's electricity market was deregulated.

·        California didn't have enough electrical generation capacity to meet the demand.

·        California stopped building power plants in the 1990's.

·        Prices went up because the energy companies were greedy.

Surprisingly, none of the above is true. What is true?

(quoted here from Amory Lovins, CEO of the Rocky Mountain Institute http://www.rmi.org/images/other/E-CwealthClub.pdf)

California's electricity consumption did not soar, in Silicon Valley or anywhere else, due to the Internet or anything else. It simply didn't happen.

California did not stop building power plants in the 1990s. Reserves did tighten, but stayed adequate.

Probably California has not even been short of generating capacity during any of its power emergencies. The same system that suffered rolling blackouts in January under a 29GW load, produced 53GW the summer before.

The supply expansions now under way may well already be in overshoot (building more than is needed) even before the savings also underway have really ripened.

So what went wrong? The politicians who created this market and defined its rules did a horrible job. The article listed above is a great read. I recommend it highly. Here is the basic summary.

In short, the rules of the game suffered in a few key ways.

The market was half-deregulated. The price to purchase wholesale electricity was determined on a free spot-market. The price to sell electricity to consumers and industry was capped.

The market to purchase was restricted so that no long-term contracts could be made. (Interestingly enough, when CA Gov. Grey Davis took over to fix things the first thing he did was to sign a 10 year contract at prices which, a year later, are far above market prices.)

The market did not have enough producers. The few big producers who were there could individually affect the price in the market by deciding to not produce at full capacity. (Which is exactly what they did.)

Simultaneous deregulation of the gas markets were done with rules that designed away any incentive for anyone to store natural gas for winter use in Southern California. Prior to the new rules of the game, gas had been stored up every year for winter use.

One year ago we had a Perfect Storm of factors colliding together to make electricity really expensive. But the storm wasn't caused by freak weather, physical accidents or unlikely coincidences. It was caused by a couple markets created with very bad rules or complete ignorance of the fact that companies will (and should) behave like companies and do the best they can within the rules of the game.

A minor part of this sad story that is not well-known at all is the tale of Green Mountain Energy.

The one part of the promise of California's deregulation that appeared to be working was the growing market for electricity produced from alternate sources. Green Mountain Energy was one such producer. Their rates were a little bit higher than average but they attracted a lot of customers with the message that their electricity was cleaner. Their rates were also much more stable since the "God Utility" never changes his price. Green Mountain expanded their production in the short time they were in business in California by building new solar and wind plants.

Unfortunately for them, the rules of the game said that the price paid for electrical generation was tied to the market price of natural gas, not to a market price for electricity. This should have been a boon for Green Mountain as the price of natural gas went up substantially during the crisis. But the rules said that Green Mountain got paid not by consumers but by PG&E who transmitted the power. Well, PG&E simply refused to pay anything to Green Mountain. Green Mountain shut down and left the state. Today Californians are again forced to buy electricity from PG&E.

California politicians will vote any day now to end deregulation, which is ironic, because they never voted to start it in the first place.

Finally Mean Gene must point out that one of our faithful readers is gainfully employed in studying the financial transactions and the game theory of the California electricity market, and we hope he will offer his insights.

 

Next time - what should the rules of the game be? It's not so easy.